Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International journal of science and technology
Articles

TUPROQ UNUMDORLIGINI SAQLASHDA YANGI BIOTEXNOLOGIK YONDASHUVLAR

PDF
  • Odilov Nosirjon Omonjon o‘g‘li,
  • Obidov Muzaffarjon Valijonovich

Published 03-04-2025

Keywords

  • mikrobial o‘g‘itlar, Tuproq unumdorligi, O‘simlik o‘sishini rag‘batlantiruvchi rizobakteriyalar (PGPR), Biologik azot fiksatsiyasi, Ekologik barqarorlik, Fitogormonlar, Patogenlar.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

TUPROQ UNUMDORLIGINI SAQLASHDA YANGI BIOTEXNOLOGIK YONDASHUVLAR. (2025). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2(4), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.70728/tech.v2.i04.031

Abstract

Dunyoda aholi sonining ortishi va ekin maydonlarining qisqarishi, qishloq xo‘jaligida hosildorlikni oshirish zaruratini
tug‘dirmoqda. Qishloq xo’jaligiada an’anaviy kimyoviy o‘g‘itlarning uzoq muddatli qo‘llanilishi tuproq unumdorligining
pasayishiga va ekologik muvozanatning buzilishiga sabab bo‘lmoqda. Shu sababli, ushbu muammolarning ekologik xavfsiz va
barqaror yechimi sifatida mikroorganizmlar asosidagi o‘g‘itlardan foydalanish dolzarb masalaga aylanmoqda. Ushbu maqolada
o‘simlik o‘sishini rag‘batlantiruvchi rizobakteriyalar asosida ishlab chiqilgan bioo‘g‘itlarni ekinlarning o‘sishi, turli stress
omillariga chidamliligiga va tuproq sifatining yaxshilanishiga ta’siri tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, ushbu o‘g‘itlarning tuproq
mikrobiomasini o‘zgarishi, o‘simliklarning oziqa elementlari bilan ta’minlanishiga ko‘maklashish va ekotizim barqarorligini
saqlashdagi roli haqidagi ilmiy ma’lumotlar ko‘rib chiqilgan.

PDF

References

  1. 1. Kerr RB, Madsen S., Stuber M., Liebert J., Enloe S., Borghino N., Parros P., Mutyambai DM, Prudhon M., Wezel A. Can agroecology improve food security and nutrition? Review. Glob. Food Security. 2021;29:100540. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100540. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
  2. 2. Alisherovich, M. A., Olimjon o‘g‘li, C. J. Komplex Evaluation Of Different Fertilization Systems In The Cultivation Of Vegetables On Different Field Soils. European Journal of Agricultural and Rural Education, 3(3), 22-25.
  3. 3. Alisherovich, MA and Olimjon o‘g‘li, CJ (2023). PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF TOMATO TRANSITIONS IN DIFFERENT SALTS. World Scientific Research Journal, 13 (1), 27-34.
  4. 4. Alisherovich, MA, Olimjon o‘g‘li, CJ Ubaydullayeva Shohista Hidoyatillo qizi.(2023). INFLUENCE OF FOOD STRUCTURE ON MICROBIAL ACTIVITY. IQRO JOURNAL, 2 (1), 565–572 . “PERSPECTIVES FOR THE INTEGRATION OF NATURAL SCIENCES” REPUBLICAN SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 22, 2024 400
  5. 5. Alisherovich, M. A. Olimjon o‘g‘li, CJ (2023). FUTURE BUILDING MATERIAL: BIO CONCRETE SELF-HEALTHING. Journal of Universal Science Research, 1(4), 6-15.
  6. 6. Alisherovich, MA and Olimjon o‘g‘li, CJ (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF CULTIVATION OF MOGLY PLANTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HYDROMORPHIC SOILS. SCIENCE EDUCATION AND INNOVATION IDEAS IN THE WORLD , 17 (3), 134- 137.
  7. 7. Musurmonov, A. A., Absalomova, K. A., Temirova, M. T., Rakhmatov, A. H. (2021). MEDICAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF LEMON. Economy and Society, (5-1 (84)), 341-344.
  8. 8. Larsen J., Jaramillo-López P., Nájera-Rincon M., González Esquivel C. Biotic interactions in the rhizosphere in relation to plant and soil nutrient dynamics. J. Soil Science. Plant Nutr. 2015;15:449–463. doi: 10.4067/S0718- 95162015005000039. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
  9. 9. Chamkhi I., El Omari N., Balahbib A., El Menyiy N., Benali T., Ghoulam C. Is the rhizosphere a source of many beneficial microorganisms used for plant improvement? Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022;29:1246–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.032. [ DOI] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  10. 10. Goyal S., Dhanker R., Hussain T., Ferreira A., Gouveia L., Kumar K., Mohamed HI Recent progress in biotechnological applications for wastewater treatment using microalgae: A review. Water Air Soil Cont. 2023;234:417. doi: 10.1007/s11270-023-06409-2. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
  11. 11. Bamdad H., Papari S., Lazarovits G., Berruti F. Soil amendments for sustainable agriculture: Microbial organic fertilizers. Land Use Management. 2021;38:94– 120. doi: 10.1111/sum.12762. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
  12. 12. Yap CK, Al-Mutairi KA Halal-based effective microorganisms for biofertilizer production and some socio-economic implications: a review. Foods. 2023;12:1702. doi: 10.3390/foods12081702. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  13. 13. Kiruba NJM, Saeid A. Insights into microbial inoculants for bioconversion of waste biomass into sustainable “bioorganic” fertilizers: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:13049. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113049. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  14. 14. Mitter EK, Tosi M, Obregón D, Dunfield KE, Germida JJ Rethinking crop nutrition in the era of modern microbiology: innovative biofertilizer technologies. Rev. Sustainability. Food System. 2021;5:606815. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.606815. [ DOI] [ Google Scholar ]
  15. 15. Daniel AI, Fadaka AO, Gokul A, Bakare OO, Aina O, Fisher S, Burt AF, Mavumengwana V, Keyster M, Klein A. Biofertilizers: The future of food security and food safety. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1220. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061220. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  16. 16. O’Callaghan M., Ballard RA, Wright D. Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: limitations and opportunities. Land Use Management. 2022;38:1340–1369. doi: 10.1111/sum.12811. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]