Vol. 3 No. 04 (2026): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Articles

THE PEDAGOGICAL POTENTIAL OF NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND AI-BASED AUTOMATED ANALYSIS SYSTEMS FOR DEVELOPING LOGICAL THINKING IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

PDF
  • Eshimbetov Jurabek Reyimbayevich
Eshimbetov Jurabek Reyimbayevich
Lecturer at the Department of Exact and Social Sciences, Tashkent University of Humanities, Republic of Karakalpakstan, Turtkul District, Republic of Uzbekistan

Published 23-03-2026

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence, logical thinking, mathematics education, intelligent tutoring systems, automated evaluation, natural language processing, AI chatbot, reflective learning.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

THE PEDAGOGICAL POTENTIAL OF NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND AI-BASED AUTOMATED ANALYSIS SYSTEMS FOR DEVELOPING LOGICAL THINKING IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. (2026). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 3(04), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.70728/tech.v3.i04.011

Abstract

In the context of digitalization of education and the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, the problem of developing students’ logical and analytical thinking becomes particularly important. Modern mathematics education requires not only mastery of algorithmic skills but also the ability to reason, argue, and find solutions independently. The application of AI technologies in mathematics education makes it possible to reorganize the learning process - to make it adaptive, interactive, and oriented toward the cognitive characteristics of students. AI tools such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), Computerized Dynamic Assessment (CDA), Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and chatbots provide new forms of interactive engagement, analytical observation, and reflective learning. Therefore, the relevance of this study lies in the need for a scientific and methodological understanding of the role of AI technologies in developing logical thinking during mathematics education and in justifying the pedagogical conditions for their effective use in a digital learning environment.

PDF

References

  1. 1. Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313 - 334.
  2. 2. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584 - 607.
  3. 3. Bibauw, S., François, T., Desmet, P. (2019). Discussing with a computer to practice a foreign language: Research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 1 - 51.
  4. 4. Boulton, A., Vyatkina, N. (2021). Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 66 - 89.
  5. 5. Casler-Failing, S. L. (2018). Robotics and math: Using action research to study growth problems. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 19(2), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v19i2.383
  6. 6. Chinkina, M., Ruiz, S., & Meurers, D. (2020). Crowdsourcing evaluation of the quality of automatically generated questions for supporting computer-assisted language teaching. ReCALL, 32(2), 145 - 161.
  7. 7. Chesani, F., Mello, P., Milano, M. (2017). Solving mathematical puzzles: A challenging competition for AI. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 38(3), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2736
  8. 8. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2021). Artificial intelligence. https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence.
  9. 9. Evers, K., Chen, S. (2022). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1869 – 1889.
  10. 10. Gao, S. (2020). Innovative teaching of integration of artificial intelligence and university mathematics in big data environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 750(1), 012137. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/750/1/012137
  11. 11. Gulynina, E. V. (2024). Artificial intelligence and personalized learning: Prospects and challenges in the context of teaching mathematics. World of Pedagogy and Psychology (in Russian).
  12. 12. Hadley, G., Charles, M. (2017). Enhancing extensive reading with data-driven learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 131 - 152.
  13. 13. Han, T., Sari, E. (2022). An investigation on the use of automated feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067179.
  14. 14. Huang, J., Zhang, T. (2023). “GenieTutor: An AI-Powered Conversational System for Personalized Learning.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100132.
  15. 15. Kamrood, A. M., Davoudi, M., Ghaniabadi, S., Amirian, S. M. R. (2021). Diagnosing L2 learners’ development through online computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 868 - 897.
  16. 16. Kolobaev, V. K., Morozova, I. K. (2024). Opportunities for using artificial intelligence in teaching mathematics. World of Pedagogy and Psychology, No. 8 (97) (in Russian).
  17. 17. Kuzmenko, M. V. (2025). Artificial intelligence in school mathematics education: Awareness, readiness, and use by mathematics teachers. Psychological Science and Education, 30(3), 125–139 (in Russian).
  18. 18. Liang, J.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., Darmawansah, D. (2021). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348.
  19. 19. Liu, S., Yu, G. (2022). L2 learners’ engagement with automated feedback: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 78 - 105.
  20. 20. Mindzak, M., Eaton, S. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence is getting better at writing, and universities should worry about plagiarism. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/artificial-intelligence-is-getting-better-at-writing-and-universities-should-worry-about-plagiarism-160481.
  21. 21. Moussalli, S., Cardoso, W. (2020). Intelligent personal assistants: Can they understand and be understood by accented L2 learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 865 - 890.
  22. 22. Moreno-Esteva, G. E., White, S. L. J., Wood, J. M., Black, A. A. (2018). Application of mathematical and machine learning techniques to analyse eye-tracking data enabling better understanding of children’s visual-cognitive behaviours. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.365
  23. 23. Naffi, N., Davidson, A.-L., Boch, A., Nandaba, B. K., Rougui, M. (2022). AI-powered chatbots, designed ethically, can support high-quality university teaching. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ai-powered-chatbots-designed-ethically-can-support-high-quality-university-teaching-17271.
  24. 24. Oxford Reference. (2021). Artificial intelligence. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095426960.
  25. 25. Pérez-Paredes, P. (2022). A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011 - 2015. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1 - 2), 36 - 61.
  26. 26. Prokhorov, D. I., Brovka, N. V. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence technologies in the process of professional development and self-education of mathematics teachers. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev, No. 1 (71) (in Russian).
  27. 27. Pikhart, M. (2020). Intelligent information processing for language education: The use of artificial intelligence in language learning apps. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1412 - 1419.
  28. 28. Rojano, T., García-Campos, M. (2017). Teaching mathematics with intelligent support in natural language. Tertiary education students working with parametrized modelling activities. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 36(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw009
  29. 29. Smunty, L., Schreiberova, P. (2023). Challenges in Emotional Design of Chatbots for Education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 1098 - 1115.
  30. 30. Tai, T. Y., Chen, H. H. J. (2023). The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1485 - 1502.
  31. 31. Veretin, R. S. (2025). Analysis of the effectiveness of digital educational platforms supported by artificial intelligence in Russian schools. Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series “Informatics and Informatization of Education”, No. 3 (73), 7–19 (in Russian).
  32. 32. Wang, X., Pang, H., Wallace, M. P., Wang, Q., Chen, W. (2022). Learners’ perceived AI presences in AI-supported language learning: A study of AI as a humanized agent from community of inquiry. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2056203.
  33. 33. Wu, R. (2021). Visualization of basic mathematics teaching based on artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(1), 042042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1992/4/042042
  34. 34. Yang, Y., Qian, D. D. (2020). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5 - 6), 628 - 652.
  35. 35. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Social science Research Network (SSRN). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418.
  36. 36. Zhong, B., Xia, L. (2020). A systematic review on exploring the potential of educational robotics in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y.